| Games | Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | G | GS | Cmp | Att | Cmp % | Yds | TD | INT | Rtng | Att | Yds | YPC | TD | Fmb |
| 2018 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 50% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 56.2 | 7 | -7 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 16 | 15 | 276 | 469 | 58.85% | 3098 | 13 | 7 | 81.7 | 63 | 260 | 4.1 | 4 | 8 |
| 2016 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 55 | 61.82% | 400 | 0 | 0 | 83.9 | 16 | 83 | 5.2 | 1 | 3 |
| Week | Position | Points | Team | Opponent | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Starter | 23.42 | Guantanamo | Silicon Valley | L, 132.82-144.82 |
| 11 | Bench | 21.88 | Guantanamo | Anchorage | L, 97.62-121.16 |
| 12 | Bench | 20.68 | Guantanamo | Honolulu | L, 118.26-137.44 |
| 13 | Bench | 21.64 | Guantanamo | Stumpy Point | L, 98.60-102.76 |
| 14 | Starter | 21.04 | Guantanamo | Shippensburg | L, 70.09-92.00 |
| 15 | Bench | 24.56 | Guantanamo | Cool | W, 127.86-62.96 |
| 16 | Bench | 10.62 | Guantanamo | Cool | W, 129.86-33.80 |
| 17 | Bench | 20.48 | Guantanamo | Cool | W, 119.18-68.70 |
| Week | Position | Points | Team | Opponent | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bench | 16.50 | Honolulu | Fargo | W, 125.12-102.02 |
| 2 | Starter | 16.34 | Honolulu | Cool | L, 83.54-109.47 |
| 3 | Bench | 20.80 | Honolulu | St. Louis | W, 116.03-114.14 |
| 4 | Starter | 22.50 | Honolulu | Stumpy Point | L, 101.70-127.68 |
| 5 | Starter | 10.94 | Honolulu | Gnaw Bone | W, 101.99-96.66 |
| 6 | Bench | 0.00 | Honolulu | Shippensburg | L, 78.17-109.20 |
| 7 | Starter | 27.64 | Honolulu | Cool | W, 130.44-59.14 |
| 8 | Bench | 9.48 | Honolulu | Silicon Valley | L, 104.25-125.22 |
| 9 | Bench | 2.76 | Honolulu | Fargo | W, 139.78-114.60 |
| 10 | Bench | 0.00 | Honolulu | Anchorage | W, 87.27-69.48 |
| 11 | Starter | 15.12 | Honolulu | St. Louis | W, 91.42-50.12 |
| 12 | Starter | 13.16 | Honolulu | Silicon Valley | L, 72.41-103.84 |
| 13 | Bench | 12.70 | Honolulu | Fargo | W, 97.50-78.62 |
| 14 | Bench | 22.60 | Honolulu | Fargo | W, 111.36-89.86 |
| 15 | Bench | 7.30 | Honolulu | Shippensburg | L, 123.75-142.62 |
| 16 | Bench | 15.20 | Honolulu | Shippensburg | W, 127.42-126.40 |
| Week | Position | Points | Team | Opponent | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Honolulu | W, 124.65-114.94 |
| 2 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Anchorage | L, 89.14-120.66 |
| 3 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Gnaw Bone | L, 91.35-138.55 |
| 4 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Fargo | W, 146.35-78.30 |
| 5 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | St. Louis | L, 78.70-82.50 |
| 6 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Shippensburg | L, 115.30-158.10 |
| 7 | Bench | -0.40 | Cool | Silicon Valley | W, 133.90-99.60 |
| 8 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Honolulu | W, 137.70-101.50 |
| 9 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Stumpy Point | L, 76.00-146.90 |
| 10 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | Anchorage | L, 99.85-145.20 |
| 11 | Bench | -0.40 | Cool | Fargo | W, 133.55-65.75 |
| 12 | Bench | 0.20 | Cool | St. Louis | W, 126.65-108.15 |
| 13 | Bench | L, - | |||
| 14 | Bench | L, - |
| Week | Position | Points | Team | Opponent | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Bench | 9.60 | Cool | Honolulu | W, 115.00-112.50 |
| 5 | Starter | 18.00 | Cool | Anchorage | L, 101.70-120.60 |
| 6 | Starter | 14.00 | Cool | Taintsville | W, 102.20-89.40 |
| 7 | Starter | 11.10 | Cool | Silicon Valley | W, 92.80-74.30 |
| 8 | Starter | 15.90 | Cool | St. Louis | L, 100.90-110.00 |
| 9 | Starter | 19.50 | Cool | Guantanamo | L, 80.30-81.50 |
| 10 | Starter | 15.60 | Cool | Fargo | W, 98.40-63.10 |
| 11 | Bench | 0.00 | Cool | St. Louis | L, 112.00-123.70 |
| 12 | Starter | 7.40 | Cool | Honolulu | L, 87.90-115.10 |
| 13 | Bench | 10.60 | Cool | Silicon Valley | W, 127.10-102.40 |
| 14 | Bench | 7.80 | Cool | Silicon Valley | L, 59.90-132.70 |
| 15 | Bench | 14.10 | Cool | Silicon Valley | W, 105.20-93.20 |
| 16 | Bench | 13.40 | Cool | Silicon Valley | W, 64.70-60.30 |